Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Konferenzbeitrag

Reading Perception - Perceiving Literature: an Interdisciplinary Approach

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons84115

Nusseck,  M
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Enactive-07-Lampert.pdf
(beliebiger Volltext), 158KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Lampert, A., Nusseck, M., Wertheimer, J., & Bülthoff, H. (2007). Reading Perception - Perceiving Literature: an Interdisciplinary Approach. In A. Lucianiu, & C. Cadoz (Eds.), 4th International Conference on Enactive Interfaces: Enactive / 07.. Enaction_in_Arts (pp. 369-372). Grenoble, France: Association ACROE.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-CB17-A
Zusammenfassung
This paper presents the results of experiments made within the interdisciplinary project between the
Department for Comparative Literature at the
University of Tübingen and Max Planck Institute for
Biological Cybernetics. We examined the following
three questions using both psychophysical and
structuralistic-hermeneutical methods: a) Are there
regularities in the judgments of spatial descriptions by
different readers? b) Do readers encode the perceptual
perspective of characters during reading? c) Are there
correspondences between foregrounding effects and
the physiological reaction (galvanic skin response) of
readers? The results show that a) that the semantic
validation of spatial descriptions showed high
homogeneity; b) the method actually showed more
about literary strategies concerning object occluding
and required the development of new experiment
approaches to identify the perspective taken by the
reader, that c) the emotional response is quite
idiosyncratic but can be roughly divided into two
schemes (high or low response).