de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84378

Campos,  JL
Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84853

Siegle,  J
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84088

Mohler,  BJ
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84874

Loomis,  JM
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Campos, J., Siegle, J., Mohler, B., Loomis, J., & Bülthoff, H. (2008). Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion. Poster presented at 8th Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society (VSS 2008), Naples, FL, USA.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-C929-0
Abstract
Self-motion perception refers to the ability to perceive the speed and direction of movement through space. Past measures of self-motion perception have failed to directly assess the dynamic, instantaneous properties of perceived self-motion in real-world coordinates. Here we developed a novel continuous pointing method to measure perceived self-motion during translational movements. This experiment took place in a large, fully tracked, free-walking space. Participants viewed a target and then, with eyes closed, attempted to point continuously towards the target as they moved past it along a straight, forward trajectory. Pointing behaviour was tracked using a high-precision optical tracking system which monitored a hand-held pointing device. By using arm angle, we continuously measured participants' perceived location and, hence, perceived self-velocity during the entire trajectory. We compared the natural characteristics of continuous pointing in a control condition (sighted walking) with that during conditions in which particular sensory/motor cues were reduced, including: blind walking, passive transport, and imagined walking in the complete absence of physical movement. Results demonstrate that under all reduced cue conditions involving actual movement, perceived self-velocity and displacement were relatively accurate. Specifically, the pattern of pointing in the blind walking condition did not differ from that of the passive transport condition. This indicates that, for simple, linear trajectories with a raised-cosine velocity profile, inertial cues alone can be used to perceive self-motion. Perhaps most interestingly, the “signature” pattern of pointing observed during true self-motion (notably an increase in arm azimuth velocity upon target approach) was absent during imagined pointing. Consequently, continuous pointing reveals a characteristic arm trajectory that is unique to actual self-motion. This appears to be an automatic, obligatory process that is not reproduced during a purely cognitive representation of self-motion in the absence of movement. This method has direct implications for several research areas, including spatial cognition and navigation.