# Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

#### Similarity, Kernels, and the Triangle Inequality

##### MPS-Authors

##### Locator

There are no locators available

##### Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts available

##### Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

##### Citation

Jäkel, F., Schölkopf, B., & Wichmann, F. (2008). Similarity, Kernels, and the Triangle
Inequality.* Journal of Mathematical Psychology,* *52*(2),
297-303. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2008.03.001.

Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-C71B-F

##### Abstract

Similarity is used as an explanatory construct throughout psychology and multidimensional scaling (MDS) is the most popular way to assess similarity. In MDS, similarity is intimately connected to the idea of a geometric representation of stimuli in a perceptual space. Whilst connecting similarity and closeness of stimuli in a geometric representation may be intuitively plausible, Tversky and Gati [Tversky, A., Gati, I. (1982). Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. Psychological Review, 89(2), 123154] have reported data which are inconsistent with the usual geometric representations that are based on segmental additivity. We show that similarity measures based on Shepards universal law of generalization [Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychologica science. Science, 237(4820), 13171323] lead to an inner product representation in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space. In such a space stimuli are represented by their similarity to all other stimuli. This representation, based on Shepards law, has a natural metric that does not have additive segments whilst still retaining the intuitive notion of connecting similarity and distance between stimuli. Furthermore, this representation has the psychologically appealing property that the distance between stimuli is bounded.