English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Meeting Abstract

Pattern recognition methods in classifying fMRI data

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84029

Ku,  S-P
Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83946

Gretton,  A
Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84066

Macke,  J
Research Group Computational Vision and Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84063

Logothetis,  NK
Department Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ku, S.-P., Gretton, A., Macke, J., & Logothetis, N. (2008). Pattern recognition methods in classifying fMRI data. In 9th Conference of the Junior Neuroscientists of Tübingen (NeNa 2008) (pp. 11).


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-C6F3-6
Abstract
Pattern recognition methods have shown that fMRI data can reveal signicant information about brain activity. For example, in the debate of how object categories are represented
in the brain, multivariate analysis has been used to provide evidence of a distributed
encoding scheme. Many follow up studies have employed dierent methods to analyze
human fMRI data with varying degrees of success. In this presentation I would like
to discuss and compare four popular pattern recognition methods: correlation analysis,
support vector machines (SVM), linear discriminant analysis and Gaussian nave Bayes
(GNB), using data collected at high eld (7T) with higher resolution than usual fMRI
studies. We investigate prediction performance on single trials and for averages across
varying numbers of stimulus presentations. The performance of the various algorithms
depends on the nature of the brain activity being categorized: for several tasks, many of
the methods work well, whereas for others, no methods perform above chance level. An
important factor in overall classication performance is careful preprocessing of the data,
including dimensionality reduction, voxel selection, and outlier elimination.