de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Talk

Theoretical and experimental comparison of different techniques for continuous arterial spin labelling

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84145

Pohmann,  R
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83838

Budde,  J
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Pohmann, R., & Budde, J. (2008). Theoretical and experimental comparison of different techniques for continuous arterial spin labelling. Talk presented at ESMRMB 2008 Congress: 25th Annual Meeting. Valencia, Spain.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-C693-B
Abstract
Purpose/Introduction: Continuous arterial spin labelling is the most sensitive technique for perfusion measurements. Several schemes for tag and control scans have been developped to overcome the technical and condeptual problems of this technique. Here, four different approaches for tag and control are simulated and compared experimentally. Subjects and Methods: Four sequence variants are compared that differ only in the way the tag or control pulses are applied: In CASL, separate tagging coils at the neck label the inflowing blood with one long pulse [1]. In ACASL, the tag is applied by the same coil used for imaging [2], but, due to technical constraints, this pulse has to be interrupted at regular intervals. For multi-slice acquisition (ms-ACASL) the control scan uses an oscillating pulse to avoid nonsymmetric magnetization transfer effects [3]. In PCASL [4], the tag is composed of a large number of short pulses and gradient shapes, with the control scan modifying the puls phases as to be transparent to the flowing spins. These four tagging techniques have been simulated and implemented on a Siemens Trio with an EPI-readout. The simulations were used to optimize the parameters of all sequences. Results: Two volunteers were examined with each of the four techniques, as well as with a standard FAIR sequence as representative of pulsed ASL. For all CASL measurements, the tagging duration was 2 s; with a delay of 1s before acquiring 7 slices (ss-ACASL: 1 slice). Only the center slice was used for futher analysis. Figure 1 shows the perfusion images as generated with FSL from the same slice in one volunteer acquired with all five sequences. Voxels with a significant perfusion signal (Z = 3.7) are red. Sensitivity differences between the sequences result in a different number of significant voxels.