de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

The impact of multisensory and unisensory integration on covert and overt orienting

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84049

Leo,  F
Research Group Cognitive Neuroimaging, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Passamonti, C., Leo, F., & Làdavas, E. (2009). The impact of multisensory and unisensory integration on covert and overt orienting. Poster presented at 10th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF 2009), New York, NY, USA.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-C425-6
Abstract
The products of unisensory and multisensory integration within the Superior Colliculus were found to be appreciably different. Moreover, recent data from cats suggests that multiple stimuli from the same sensory modality only marginally enhance localization compared to cross-modal stimulus combinations. In the present study, we investigated whether the integration of stimuli from different modalities (cross-modal) and from the same modality (within-modal) have a different impact on spatial orienting in humans. To this aim, we asked subjects to perform a simple reaction time task (Experiment 1) and a localization task (Experiment 2), which comprised modality-specific stimuli (visual or auditory), cross-modal stimulus pairs (visual-auditory) and within-modal stimulus pairs (visual-visual). Although both the integrative modes shortened RTs compared to the best unimodal condition, the redundancy gain was significantly greater for cross-modal than within-modal stimulus combinations. Moreover, a violation of race model inequality was observed only for the cross-modal condition. In addition, cross-modal stimulus combinations yielded a greater improvement in stimulus localization, according to a Bayesian model of spatial integration. The present results suggest that the integration of stimuli from different modalities and from the same modality have a different impact on covert and overt orienting, and support the hypothesis that the behavioural products derived from multisensory integration are not attributable to simple target redundancy.