de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Impressum Kontakt Einloggen
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Konferenzbeitrag

Modeling Human Dynamics in Combined Ramp-Following and Disturbance-Rejection Tasks

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84644

Pool,  DM
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Pool, D., van Paassen, M., & Mulder, M. (2010). Modeling Human Dynamics in Combined Ramp-Following and Disturbance-Rejection Tasks. In AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2010 (pp. 569-586). Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-BEC0-2
Zusammenfassung
This paper investigates the modeling of humanmanual control behavior for pursuit tracking tasks in which target forcing functions consisting of multiple ramp-like changes in target attitude are used. Due to the use of a pursuit display and the predictability of such forcing function signals, it can be anticipated that a pursuit or precognitive control strategy, consisting of open-loop feedforward control inputs in response to the predictable reference signal, is applied by the human operator. If combined with an additional disturbance on the controlled element, a control task results that is similar to performing a commanded turn entry/exit or altitude capture in turbulence. It is as of yet uncertain if such pursuit or precognitive control is indeed used during such a control task, and to what extent a quasi-random disturbance would suppress pursuit/precognitive control strategies. A human-in-the-loop evaluation of the combined ramp-following and disturbance-rejection task was performed to gather data for the modeling of human manual control behavior. It is found that despite the anticipated pursuit and precognitive control inputs, classical compensatory models of human manual control dynamics are highly capable of describing human dynamics for these specific control tasks. Measured control inputs, however, are found to correspond well with proposed models for open-loop feedforward operations as well, suggesting future evaluation of a model of human behavior that combines, or switches between, error-reducing compensatory and open-loop feedforward operations.