A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles

Alaimo, SMC; Pollini, L; Bresciani, J-P; Bülthoff, HH

doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598647

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Conference Paper

A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons83778

Alaimo, SMC
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83831

Bresciani, J-P
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff, HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5598647
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Alaimo, S., Pollini, L., Bresciani, J.-P., & Bülthoff, H. (2010). A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles. In A. Avizzano, E. Ruffaldi, M. Fontana, M. Carrozzino, & M. Bergamasco (Eds.), 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Ro-Man 2010) (pp. 506-512). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-BE60-9

Abstract

The paper presents an experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts: Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding. Two Haptic systems were designed and tested using an experimental setup. The problem of wind gust rejection in Remotely Piloted Vehicles is used as test bench. Test results show the effectiveness of both methods but a better performance of the IHA-based system for pilots without any previous training about the experiment. DHA-based system provided instead better results after some pilot training on the experiment. Pilots reported better sensation of the wind gusts with IHA-based feedback.