de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Impressum Kontakt Einloggen
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Konferenzbeitrag

A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83778

Alaimo,  SMC
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons84877

Pollini,  L
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83831

Bresciani,  J-P
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Alaimo, S., Pollini, L., Bresciani, J.-P., & Bülthoff, H. (2010). A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding for Remotely Piloted Vehicles. In 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Ro-Man 2010) (pp. 506-512). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-BE60-9
Zusammenfassung
The paper presents an experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts: Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding. Two Haptic systems were designed and tested using an experimental setup. The problem of wind gust rejection in Remotely Piloted Vehicles is used as test bench. Test results show the effectiveness of both methods but a better performance of the IHA-based system for pilots without any previous training about the experiment. DHA-based system provided instead better results after some pilot training on the experiment. Pilots reported better sensation of the wind gusts with IHA-based feedback.