English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Combination and Integration in the Perception of Visual-Haptic Compliance Information

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons83885

Di Luca,  M
Research Group Multisensory Perception and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Kuschel, M., Di Luca, M., Buss, M., & Klatzky, R. (2010). Combination and Integration in the Perception of Visual-Haptic Compliance Information. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 3(4), 234-244. doi:10.1109/TOH.2010.9.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-BDB6-2
Abstract
The compliance of a material can be conveyed through mechanical interactions in a virtual environment and perceived
through both visual and haptic cues.We investigated this basic aspect of perception. In two experiments subjects performed compliance
discriminations, and the mean perceptual estimate (PSE) and and the perceptual standard deviation (proportional to JND) were derived
from psychophysical functions. Experiment 1 supported a model in which each modality acted independently to produce a compliance
estimate, and the two estimates were then integrated to produce an overall value. Experiment 2 tested three mathematical models of
the integration process. The data ruled out exclusive reliance on the more reliable modality and stochastic selection of one modality.
Instead the results supported an integration process that constitutes a weighted summation of two random variables, which are defined
by the single modality estimates. The model subsumes optimal fusion but provided valid predictions also if the weights were not optimal.
Weights were optimal (i.e., minimized variance) when vision and haptic inputs were congruent, but not when they were incongruent.