日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

会議論文

Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding in an Obstacle Avoidance Task for Tele-Operated Systems

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons83831

Bresciani,  J-P
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Alaimo, S., Pollini, L., Bresciani, J.-P., & Bülthoff, H. (2011). Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Haptic Aiding in an Obstacle Avoidance Task for Tele-Operated Systems. In S., Bittanti, A., Cenedese, & S., Zampieri (Eds.), 18th IFAC World Congress. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-BA46-5
要旨
The sense of telepresence is very important in teleoperation environments in which the operator is physically separated from the vehicle. It appears reasonable, and it has already been shown in the literature, that extending the visual feedback with force feedback is able to complement the visual information (when missing or limited) through the sense of touch and allows the operator to better perceive information from the remote environment and its constraints, hopefully preventing dangerous collisions. This paper focuses on a novel concept of haptic cueing for an airborne obstacle avoidance task; the novel cueing algorithm was designed in order to appear “natural” to the operator, and to improve the human-machine interface without directly acting on the actual aircraft commands. An experimental evaluation of two different Haptic aiding concepts for obstacle avoidance is presented. An existing and widely used approach, belonging to what we called the Direct Haptic Aid (DHA) class, and a novel one based on the Indirect Haptic Aid (IHA) class. The two haptic aids were compared with a baseline condition in which no haptic force was associated to the obstacles. Test results show that a net improvement in terms of performance (i.e. the number of collisions) is provided by employing the IHA haptic cue instead of both the DHA haptic cue and the visual cue only. Most participants of the experiment reported the strongest force feeling, the most necessary effort and also the most helpful sensation with DHA and IHA conditions with respect to the baseline condition. This paper shows that the IHA philosophy is a valid alternative to the other commonly used, and published in the scientific literature, approaches which fall in the DHA category.