de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Towards operational remote sensing of forest carbon balance across Northern Europe

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons62454

Kutsch,  W. L.
Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. E.-D. Schulze, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

Locator
Fulltext (public)

BGC1139.pdf
(Publisher version), 866KB

BGC1139D.pdf
(Preprint), 1002KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Olofsson, P., Lagergren, F., Lindroth, A., Lindstrom, J., Klemedtsson, L., Kutsch, W. L., et al. (2008). Towards operational remote sensing of forest carbon balance across Northern Europe. Biogeosciences, 5(3), 817-832. doi:10.5194/bg-5-817-2008.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000E-D727-C
Abstract
Monthly averages of ecosystem respiration ( ER), gross primary production (GPP) and net ecosystem exchange ( NEE) over Scandinavian forest sites were estimated using regression models driven by air temperature ( AT), absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) and vegetation indices. The models were constructed and evaluated using satellite data from Terra/MODIS and measured data collected at seven flux tower sites in northern Europe. Data used for model construction was excluded from the evaluation. Relationships between ground measured variables and the independent variables were investigated. It was found that the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) at 250m resolution was highly noisy for the coniferous sites, and hence, 1 km EVI was used for the analysis. Linear relationships between EVI and the biophysical variables were found: correlation coefficients between EVI and GPP, NEE, and AT ranged from 0.90 to 0.79 for the deciduous data, and from 0.85 to 0.67 for the coniferous data. Due to saturation, there were no linear relationships between normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the ground measured parameters found at any site. APAR correlated better with the parameters in question than the vegetation indices. Modeled GPP and ER were in good agreement with measured values, with more than 90% of the variation in measured GPP and ER being explained by the coniferous models. The site-specific respiration rate at 10 degrees C (R-10) was needed for describing the ER variation between sites. Even though monthly NEE was modeled with less accuracy than GPP, 61% and 75% (dec. and con., respectively) of the variation in the measured time series was explained by the model. These results are important for moving towards operational remote sensing of forest carbon balance across Northern Europe. [References: 67]