de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Carbon and water exchanges of two contrasting central Siberia landscape types: regenerating forest and bog

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons62523

Rebmann,  C.
Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. E.-D. Schulze, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons62444

Kolle,  O.
Service Facility Field Measurements & Instrumentation, O. Kolle, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons62549

Schulze,  E.-D.
Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. E.-D. Schulze, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Valentini, R., Dore, S., Marchi, G., Mollicone, D., Panfyorov, M., Rebmann, C., et al. (2000). Carbon and water exchanges of two contrasting central Siberia landscape types: regenerating forest and bog. Functional Ecology, 14(1), 87-96. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00396.x.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000E-CD33-E
Abstract
1. In central Siberia Pinus sylvestris forests and bogs are common elements of the landscape and they show different functional behaviour in terms of energy and carbon exchanges. 2. The two ecosystems show a remarkable difference in energy dissipation, with average Bowen ratios of 0.6 and 2.9, respectively. 3. The alternation of bogs and forests with different energy partition at the surface could affect rainfall distribution and the disturbance regimes (lightening and fires) and drive the ecology of such a complex landscape. 4. During summer, water shortage and poor nutrient conditions in the soil heavily affect carbon exchange rates of the regenerating forest (- 7.7 mmol m(-2) day(-1)). Consequently the bog becomes a significant dominant carbon sequestration element of this particular landscape with higher rates of carbon uptake (- 104.2 mmol m(-2) day(-1)). [References: 22]