English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

How to improve quality assurance in fluorometry : fluorescence-inherent sources of error and suited fluorescence standards

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons50239

Hoffmann,  K.
Research Group Development & Disease (Head: Stefan Mundlos), Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons50445

Nietfeld,  W.
Dept. of Vertebrate Genomics (Head: Hans Lehrach), Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Resch-Genger, U., Hoffmann, K., Nietfeld, W., Engel, A., Neukammer, J., Nitschke, R., et al. (2005). How to improve quality assurance in fluorometry: fluorescence-inherent sources of error and suited fluorescence standards. Journal of Fluorescence, 15(3), 337-362. doi:10.1007/s10895-005-2630-3.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-8667-A
Abstract
The scope of this paper is to illustrate the need for an improved quality assurance in fluorometry. For this purpose, instrumental sources of error and their influences on the reliability and comparability of fluorescence data are highlighted for frequently used photoluminescence techniques ranging from conventional macro- and microfluorometry over fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry to microarray technology as well as in vivo fluorescence imaging. Particularly, the need for and requirements on fluorescence standards for the characterization and performance validation of fluorescence instruments, to enhance the comparability of fluorescence data, and to enable quantitative fluorescence analysis are discussed. Special emphasis is dedicated to spectral fluorescence standards and fluorescence intensity standards.