de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Datenschutzhinweis Impressum Kontakt
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Poster

Mapping “easy” and “hard” messages onto language: Conceptual and structural variables jointly affect the timecourse of sentence formulation

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons1187

Konopka,  Agnieszka E.
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons4354

Van de Velde,  Maartje
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons1167

Meyer,  Antje S.
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Konopka_Amlap_2012.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 83KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Konopka, A. E., Van de Velde, M., & Meyer, A. S. (2012). Mapping “easy” and “hard” messages onto language: Conceptual and structural variables jointly affect the timecourse of sentence formulation. Poster presented at the 18th Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing [AMLaP 2012], Riva del Garda, Italy.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-18CB-2
Zusammenfassung
Sentence formulation requires mapping pre-verbal messages onto linguistic structures. This message-to-language mapping is often evaluated in eye-tracking tasks where speakers describe pictured events (The dog chased the mailman). Speakers can begin sentence formulation by quickly selecting the first-fixated character as the sentential starting point (lexical incrementality), or generating a rudimentary sentence plan based on their construal of the event gist before selecting a starting point (hierarchical incrementality; Kuchinsky & Bock, 2010). Lexical incrementality predicts fast divergence of fixations while hierarchical incrementality predicts slower divergence of fixations to the two characters within 200ms of picture onset.