de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Datenschutzhinweis Impressum Kontakt
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Konferenzbeitrag

Zooplankton of a small eutrophic lake: impact of a biomanipulation attempt.

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons56839

Mumm,  Heike
Department Ecophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Limnology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons56781

Kremser,  Annette
Department Ecophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Limnology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons56790

Lampert,  Winfried
Department Ecophysiology, Max Planck Institute for Limnology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Mumm, H., Kremser, A., & Lampert, W. (2000). Zooplankton of a small eutrophic lake: impact of a biomanipulation attempt.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-DFD4-6
Zusammenfassung
In a 3-year experiment carried out in the small eutrophic Plusssee (North Germany), we tested the hypothesis that large grazers as well as invertebrate predators are favoured by biomanipulation. The effect of piscivorous fish addition and removal of planktivores on zooplankton was estimated by ARIMA-modelling. The intervention analysis of zooplankton abundance data sets from a 13-year period revealed that invertebrate predators (Chaoborus and Leptodora) were more abundant during the biomanipulation period. However, large grazers of the genus Daphnia were not favoured. The small cladoceran Diaphanosoma occurred more frequently whereas the rotifer Asplanchna was reduced. Biomanipulation success was limited because most piscivores could not be successfully established. Biomanipulation to a certain extent reduced perch which fed on multiple prey but left roach as the most important planktivore on large grazers uncontrolled.