de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Retention of particulate matter by macrophytes in a first-order stream

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons56738

Horvath,  Thomas
Limnological River Station Schlitz, Max Planck Institute for Limnology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Horvath, T. (2004). Retention of particulate matter by macrophytes in a first-order stream. Aquatic Botany, 78, 27-36. doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2003.09.003.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-C7AC-7
Abstract
Retention of coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) in streams is affected by channel complexity, especially three-dimensional structures in stream channels. Much attention has focused on woody debris as retention structures, but macrophytes should function similarly. Retention and flow characteristics were measured in 5 m long reaches at four-replicate sites in the Breitenbach (Hessen, Germany). CPOM retention was measured by releasing chips of paper (6 mm diameter) as analog CPOM. Triplicate releases (200 chips each) were done beforew and after submerged, emergent and overhanging macrophytes were removed. Discharge ranged between 3 and 4.5 l s⁻¹ during the experimental releases. Macrophyte biomass removed was 3.047, 3.012, 0.164 and 1.392 kg m⁻² (fresh weight) respectively from sites 1 to 4. Instantaneous retention rates, calculated with an exponential decay function, were significantly higher (P<0.001)with macrophytes than without macrophytes (0.8±0.2 versus 0.2±0.1). Velocity also was significantly reduced by macrophyte presence (P <0.001). Macrophyte biomass was a significant predictor of retention (P <0.001), whereas discharge was not (P = 0.3). Hence, retention appears to be positively related to macrophyte biomass. Macrophytes in the Breitenbach increase retention by forming effective sieve-like structures in the stream physically trapping CPOM and by reducing water velocity.