de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Disclaimer Contact us Login
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

How Reliable is Pooled Analysis in Political Economy? The Globalization-Welfare State Nexus Revisited

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons41225

Kittel,  Bernhard
Regimewettbewerb und Integration in den industriellen Beziehungen, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (public)

EJPR_44_2005_Kittel.pdf
(Publisher version), 259KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Kittel, B., & Winner, H. (2005). How Reliable is Pooled Analysis in Political Economy? The Globalization-Welfare State Nexus Revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 44(2), 203-254. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00228.x.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-A5FA-C
Abstract
This article analyzes various pitfalls that arise in the application of panel data methods in comparative political economy. Empirically, we refer to the debate on the globalization-welfare state nexus by re-assessing a study by Garrett and Mitchell (‘Globalization, Government Spending and Taxation in the OECD’, European Journal of Political Research 39(1) (2001): 145–177). We discuss the properties of specifications with time invariate political variables, dynamic models with nonstationary data, and autocorrelated residuals. We demonstrate that the findings of previous empirical studies are often driven by mis-specifications. Presenting a statistically well-behaved model, we find evidence that government spending is primarily driven by the state of the domestic economy. Neither partisan effects nor the international economic environment have affected public expenditure considerably.