de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Help Guide Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Talk

Two forms of requesting in Italian conversation

MPS-Authors
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons4564

Rossi,  Giovanni
Human Sociality and Systems of Language Use, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Multimodal Interaction, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Interactional Foundations of Language, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Rossi, G. (2011). Two forms of requesting in Italian conversation. Talk presented at the 21st Anéla/VIOT Juniorendag. University of Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2011-02-05.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-A3FD-3
Abstract
When making requests, speakers need to select a form from a range of concurrent alternatives available to them. In Italian conversation and everyday interaction imperatives and Mi X? interrogatives (of the kind “You pass me a pen?”) are commonly employed by speakers to request low-contingency activities that are relevant to a here-and-now purpose or need. Given this common domain of application of the two strategies, the aim of this work is to account for a specific functional distinction between them. A first distributional pattern is observed: while imperatives are overwhelmingly used within joint activities, Mi X? interrogatives are instead usually found where participants haven’t been interactionally involved in the recent past. On a closer inspection, however, the selection appears to be informed by a more locally determined logic. Imperative requests are normally licensed by a mutually accessible and traceable earlier turn or sequence. This prior interactional event entails some form of agreement or convergence by participants on a joint project the action requested is consistent with or necessary to. Conversely, a MiX? formatting assumes that what is requested be not part of a joint undertaking, but rather something in the requester’s self-interest alone that is unrelated to participants’ prior interaction.