de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Datenschutzhinweis Impressum Kontakt
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Refutational Theorem Proving for Hierarchic First-Order Theories

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons44055

Bachmair,  Leo
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons44474

Ganzinger,  Harald
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons45689

Waldmann,  Uwe
Automation of Logic, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H., & Waldmann, U. (1994). Refutational Theorem Proving for Hierarchic First-Order Theories. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing (Aaecc), 5(3/4), 193-212.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0014-AD9C-E
Zusammenfassung
We extend previous results on theorem proving for first-order clauses with equality to hierarchic first-order theories. Semantically such theories are confined to conservative extensions of the base models. It is shown that superposition together with variable abstraction and constraint refutation is refutationally complete for theories that are sufficiently complete with respect to simple instances. For the proof we introduce a concept of approximation between theorem proving systems, which makes it possible to reduce the problem to the known case of (flat) first-order theories. These results allow the modular combination of a superposition-based theorem prover with an arbitrary refutational prover for the primitive base theory, whose axiomatic representation in some logic may remain hidden. Furthermore they can be used to eliminate existentially quantified predicate symbols from certain second-order formulae.