de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Datenschutzhinweis Impressum Kontakt
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Konferenzbeitrag

On Evaluating Decision Procedures for Modal Logics

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons44660

Hustadt,  Ullrich
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons45401

Schmidt,  Renate A.
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Hustadt, U., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). On Evaluating Decision Procedures for Modal Logics. In M. E. Pollack (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97) (pp. 202-207). San Francisco, USA: Morgan Kaufmann.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-39EF-7
Zusammenfassung
This paper investigates the evaluation method of decision procedures for multi-modal logic proposed by Giunchiglia and Sebastiani as an adaptation from the evaluation method of Mitchell et al.\ of decision procedures for propositional logic. We compare three different theorem proving approaches, namely, the Davis-Putnam-based procedure K\textsc{sat}, the tableaux-based system $\mathcal{KRIS} and a translation approach combined with first-order resolution. Our results do not support the claims of Giunchiglia and Sebastiani concerning the computational superiority of K\textsc{sat} over $\mathcal{KRIS}$, and an easy-hard-easy pattern for randomly generated modal formulae.