de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Impressum Kontakt Einloggen
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Comparing Instance Generation Methods for Automated Reasoning

MPG-Autoren
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons44687

Jacobs,  Swen
Automation of Logic, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/cone/persons/resource/persons45689

Waldmann,  Uwe
Automation of Logic, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;
Programming Logics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Jacobs, S., & Waldmann, U. (2007). Comparing Instance Generation Methods for Automated Reasoning. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 38(1/3), 57-78. doi:10.1007/s10817-006-9046-x.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-000F-1E97-D
Zusammenfassung
The clause-linking technique of Lee and Plaisted proves the unsatisfiability of a set of first-order clauses by generating a sufficiently large set of instances of these clauses that can be shown to be propositionally unsatisfiable. In recent years, this approach has been refined in several directions, leading to both tableau-based methods, such as the disconnection tableau calculus, and saturation-based methods, such as primal partial instantiation and resolution-based instance generation. We investigate the relationship between these calculi and answer the question to what extent refutation or consistency proofs in one calculus can be simulated in another one.