Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONEN
  Dieser Datensatz wurde verworfen!DetailsÜbersicht

Verworfen

Buchkapitel

Implicit and explicit horizons: Landing approaches under restricted visibility conditions

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons84199

Schulte-Pelkum,  J
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Schulte-Pelkum, J. (2001). Implicit and explicit horizons: Landing approaches under restricted visibility conditions. In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 289-296). Burlington: Ashgate.


Zusammenfassung
This study focuses on the perceptual process in situations where sight conditions are restricted due to fog during landing approaches. The H-hypothesis explains the functional utility of the horizon to control the glide angle to a runway visually. Under foggy conditions, horizon information is available both from the explicit (visible) and implicit horizon (invisible, but perceptually inferable true horizon). Based on an ecological analysis of the optics during a runway approach under foggy conditions, the functional utility of the explicit and implicit H-angle was tested as a Gibsonian invariant controlling the visual glide slope. N=40 participants viewed simulated landing approaches with varying glide slopes in which sight distances were limited to resemble foggy conditions. Results indicate that subjects rather referred to the explicit than the implicit horizon when estimating the glide angle. Furthermore, there was no connection between participants‘ accuracy of the estimated implicit H-angle and the reliability of their glide angle judgements.