English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Testing the Master Constraint Programme for Loop Quantum Gravity V. Interacting Field Theories

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons20705

Dittrich,  Bianca
Quantum Gravity & Unified Theories, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons20719

Thiemann,  Thomas
Quantum Gravity & Unified Theories, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

0411142.pdf
(Preprint), 274KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Dittrich, B., & Thiemann, T. (2006). Testing the Master Constraint Programme for Loop Quantum Gravity V. Interacting Field Theories. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23(4), 1143-1162.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-4AF6-2
Abstract
This is the fifth and final paper in our series of five in which we test the master constraint programme for solving the Hamiltonian constraint in loop quantum gravity. Here we consider interacting quantum field theories, specifically we consider the non-Abelian Gauss constraints of Einstein–Yang–Mills theory and 2 + 1 gravity. Interestingly, while Yang–Mills theory in 4D is not yet rigorously defined as an ordinary (Wightman) quantum field theory on Minkowski space, in background-independent quantum field theories such as loop quantum gravity (LQG) this might become possible by working in a new, background-independent representation. While for the Gauss constraint the master constraint can be solved explicitly, for the 2 + 1 theory we are only able to rigorously define the master constraint operator. We show that the, by other methods known, physical Hilbert is contained in the kernel of the master constraint, however, to systematically derive it by only using spectral methods is as complicated as for 3 + 1 gravity and we therefore leave the complete analysis for 3 + 1 gravity.