hide
Free keywords:
-
Abstract:
Metagenomics enables the study of complex microbial communities from myriad sources, including the remains of oral and gut microbiota preserved in archaeological dental calculus and paleofeces, respectively. While accurate taxonomic assignment is essential to this process, DNA damage, characteristic to ancient samples (e.g. reduction in fragment size), may reduce the accuracy of read taxonomic assignment. Using a set of in silico-generated metagenomic datasets we investigated how the addition of ancient DNA (aDNA) damage patterns influences microbial taxonomic assignment by five widely-used profilers: QIIME/UCLUST, MetaPhlAn2, MIDAS, CLARK-S, and MALT (BLAST-X-mode). In silico-generated datasets were designed to mimic dental plaque, consisting of 40, 100, and 200 microbial species/strains, both with and without simulated aDNA damage patterns. Following taxonomic assignment, the profiles were evaluated for species presence/absence, relative abundance, alpha-diversity, beta-diversity, and specific taxonomic assignment biases. Unifrac metrics indicated that both MIDAS and MetaPhlAn2 provided the most accurate community structure reconstruction. QIIME/UCLUST, CLARK-S, and MALT had the highest number of inaccurate taxonomic assignments; however, filtering out species present at lt;0.1% abundance greatly increased the accuracy of CLARK-S and MALT. All programs except CLARK-S failed to detect some species from the input file that were in their databases. Ancient DNA damage resulted in minimal differences in species detection and relative abundance between simulated ancient and modern datasets for most programs. In conclusion, taxonomic profiling biases are program-specific rather than damage-dependent, and the choice of taxonomic classification program to use should be tailored to the research question.
