de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
Deutsch
 
Hilfe Wegweiser Impressum Kontakt Einloggen
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Gravitational Wave Damping of Neutron Star Wobble

Cutler, C., & Jones, D. I. (2001). Gravitational Wave Damping of Neutron Star Wobble. Physical Review D, 63, 024002.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Datensatz-Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-562C-9 Versions-Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-562D-7
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
2721.pdf (Verlagsversion), 105KB
Beschreibung:
-
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: PUBLIC
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Cutler, Curt1, Autor
Jones, David Ian, Autor
Affiliations:
1Astrophysical Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society, escidoc:24013              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: We calculate the effect of gravitational wave (gw) back-reaction on realistic neutron stars (NS's) undergoing torque-free precession. By ''realistic' we mean that the NS is treated as a mostly-fluid body with an elastic crust, as opposed to a rigid body. We find that gw's damp NS wobble on a timescale tau_{theta} approx 2 x 10^5 yr [10^{-7}/(DId/I_0)]^2 (kHz/ nu_s)^4, where nu_s is the spin frequency and DId is the piece of the NS's inertia tensor that "follows" the crust's principal axis (as opposed to its spin axis). We give two different derivations of this result: one based solely on energy and angular momentum balance, and another obtained by adding the Burke-Thorne radiation reaction force to the Newtonian equations of motion. This problem was treated long ago by Bertotti and Anile (1973), but their claimed result is wrong. When we convert from their notation to ours, we find that their tau_{theta} is too short by a factor of order 10^5 for typical cases of interest, and even has the wrong sign for DId negative. We show where their calculation went astray.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 2001
 Publikationsstatus: Im Druck publiziert
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: eDoc: 2721
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Physical Review D
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 63 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 024002 Identifikator: -