Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
Zur Ablage hinzufügen
 Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht
  Detecting gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries with a network of detectors: Coherent versus coincident strategies

Mukhopadhyay, H., Sago, N., Tagoshi, H., Dhurandhar, S., Takahashi, H., & Kanda, N. (2006). Detecting gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries with a network of detectors: Coherent versus coincident strategies. Physical Review D, 74(8): 083005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083005.

Item is

 

einblenden: alle ausblenden: alle

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Datensatz-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-4D11-E Versions-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-4D12-C
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
prd083005.pdf (Verlagsversion), 445KB
Öffnen   Speichern
Datei-Permalink:
https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-4D10-0
Name:
prd083005.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Öffnen
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
eDoc_access: PUBLIC
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Mukhopadhyay, Himan1, Autor
Sago, N., Autor
Tagoshi, Hideyuki, Autor
Dhurandhar, Sanjeev, Autor
Takahashi, H.2, Autor
Kanda, Nobuyuki, Autor
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent13              
2Astrophysical Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_24013              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: We compare two strategies of multidetector detection of compact binary inspiral signals, namely, the coincidence and the coherent. For simplicity we consider here two identical detectors having the same power spectral density of noise, that of initial LIGO, located in the same place and having the same orientation. We consider the cases of independent noise as well as that of correlated noise. The coincident strategy involves separately making two candidate event lists, one for each detector, and from these choosing those pairs of events from the two lists which lie within a suitable parameter window, which then are called coincidence detections. The coherent strategy on the other hand involves combining the data phase coherently, so as to obtain a single network statistic which is then compared with a single threshold. Here we attempt to shed light on the question as to which strategy is better. We compare the performances of the two methods by plotting the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for the two strategies. Several of the results are obtained analytically in order to gain insight. Further we perform numerical simulations in order to determine certain parameters in the analytic formulae and thus obtain the final complete results. We consider here several cases from the relatively simple to the astrophysically more relevant in order to establish our results. The bottom line is that the coherent strategy although more computationally expensive in general than the coincidence strategy, is superior to the coincidence strategy—considerably less false dismissal probability for the same false alarm probability in the viable false alarm regime.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2006-10
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: eDoc: 298186
ISI: 000241724000013
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083005
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Physical Review D
  Alternativer Titel : Phys. Rev. D
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 74 (8) Artikelnummer: 083005 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 1550-7998