Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Direction, Not Destination: Institutional Work Practices in the Face of Field-Level Uncertainty

Möllering, G., & Müller-Seitz, G. (2017). Direction, Not Destination: Institutional Work Practices in the Face of Field-Level Uncertainty. European Management Journal, (published online November 10). doi:10.1016/j.emj.2017.10.004.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
EJM_2017_Möllering.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 725KB
Name:
EJM_2017_Möllering.pdf
Beschreibung:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.10.004 (Verlagsversion)
Beschreibung:
Full text open access via publisher
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Möllering, Guido1, 2, Autor           
Müller-Seitz, Gordon3, Autor
Affiliations:
1Soziologie des Marktes, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214556              
2Witten/Herdecke University, Reinhard Mohn Institute of Management,, Witten, Germany, ou_persistent22              
3Department of Business Studies and Economics, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Field-configuring events; Institutional work; Practices; Uncertainty; Semiconductor industry
 Zusammenfassung: Though field-level uncertainty represents a common challenge, research seldom addresses how institutional work that aims to influence institutional change occurs in the face of uncertainty. We study institutional work practices in a field beset with high uncertainty. Focusing on a field-configuring event in the semiconductor industry, we show how institutional work is possible through practices of dealing with uncertainty that do not eliminate the basic uncertainty but nevertheless configure the field and institutionalize a common direction without specifying a final destination. We find evidence of the open-endedness and collectiveness of institutional work and we contribute to the microfoundations of institutional theory conceptualizing a set of four practices of dealing with field-level uncertainty purposively but not purposefully, i.e., bootstrapping, roadmapping, leader-picking, and issue-bracketing. We highlight the reciprocal relationship between practices and uncertainty, focus on the coordination of institutionalization, and distinguish between events in fields marked by high versus low uncertainty.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2017-10-142016-04-012017-10-272017-11-10
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 10
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: 1. Introduction
2. Theoretical background and aims
3. Research setting and methods
4. Findings
5. Discussion and theory development
6. Limitations and outlook
Acknowledgements
References
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.10.004
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: European Management Journal
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: (published online November 10) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 0263-2373
ISSN: 1873-5681