日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存
 
 
ダウンロード電子メール
  When to take a gesture seriously: On how we use and prioritize communicative cues

Gunter, T. C., & Weinbrenner, J. E. D. (2017). When to take a gesture seriously: On how we use and prioritize communicative cues. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01125.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
Gunter & Weinbrenner JoCN 2017.pdf (出版社版), 4MB
 
ファイルのパーマリンク:
-
ファイル名:
Gunter & Weinbrenner JoCN 2017.pdf
説明:
-
OA-Status:
閲覧制限:
制限付き (Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, MLNP; )
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-
CCライセンス:
-

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Gunter, Thomas C.1, 著者           
Weinbrenner, J. E. Douglas2, 著者           
所属:
1Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634551              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: When people talk, their speech is often accompanied by gestures. Although it is known that co-speech gestures can influence face-to-face communication, it is currently unclear to what extent they are actively used and under which premises they are prioritized to facilitate communication. We investigated these open questions in two experiments that varied how pointing gestures disambiguate the utterances of an interlocutor. Participants, whose event-related brain responses were measured, watched a video, where an actress was interviewed about classical literature (e.g., Goethe and Shakespeare). While responding, the actress pointed systematically to the left side to refer to, for example, Goethe, or to the right to refer to Shakespeare. Her final statement was ambiguous and combined with a pointing gesture. The P600 pattern found in Experiment 1 revealed that, when pointing was unreliable, gestures were only monitored for their cue validity and not used for reference tracking related to the ambiguity. However, when pointing was a valid cue (Experiment 2), it was used for reference tracking, as indicated by a reduced N400 for pointing. In summary, these findings suggest that a general prioritization mechanism is in use that constantly monitors and evaluates the use of communicative cues against communicative priors on the basis of accumulated error information.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語: eng - English
 日付: 2017-03-30
 出版の状態: オンラインで出版済み
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01125
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: Cambridge, MA : MIT Press Journals
ページ: - 巻号: - 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: - 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 0898-929X
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/991042752752726