Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Evaluation of Population-Based Haplotype Phasing Algorithms

Sethi, R. (2016). Evaluation of Population-Based Haplotype Phasing Algorithms. Master Thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
2016_MSc Thesis_Riccha_Sethi.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 2MB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
2016_MSc Thesis_Riccha_Sethi.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Eingeschränkt (Max Planck Institute for Informatics, MSIN; )
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Sethi, Riccha1, 2, Autor           
Marschall, Tobias2, Ratgeber           
Pfeifer, Nico2, Gutachter           
Affiliations:
1International Max Planck Research School, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, Campus E1 4, 66123 Saarbrücken, DE, ou_1116551              
2Computational Biology and Applied Algorithmics, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, ou_40046              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: The valuable information in correct order of alleles on the haplotypes has many applications in GWAS studies and population genetics. A considerable number of computational and statistical algorithms have been developed for haplotype phasing. Historically, these algorithms were compared using the simulated population data with less dense markers which was inspired by genotype data from the HapMap project. Currently due to the advancement and reduction in cost of NGS, thousands of individuals across the world have been sequenced in 1000 Genomes Project. This has generated the genotype information of individuals from different ethnicity along with much denser genetic variations in them. Here, we have developed a scalable approach to assess state-of-the-art population-based haplotype phasing algorithms with benchmark data designed by simulation of the population (unrelated and related individuals), NGS pipeline and genotype calling. The most accurate algorithm was MVNCall (v1) for phase inference in unrelated individuals while DuoHMM approach of Shapeit (v2) had lowest switch error rate of 0.298 %(with true genotype likelihoods) in the related individuals. Moreover, we also conducted a comprehensive assessment of algorithms for the imputation of missing genotypes in the population with a reference panel. For this metrics, Impute2 (v2.3.2) and Beagle (v4.1) both performed competitively under different imputation scenarios and had genotype concordance rate of >99%. However, Impute2 was better in imputation of genotypes with minor allele frequency of <0.025 in the reference panel.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2016-03-092016-03-09
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: 76 p.
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Saarbrücken : Universität des Saarlandes
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: BibTex Citekey: SethiMaster2016
 Art des Abschluß: Master

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle

einblenden: