Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal 
modelling

Lohmann, G; Müller, K; Turner, R

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.041

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

DownloadE-Mail

Bitte beachten Sie, dass eine neuere Version dieses Datensatzes verfügbar ist:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_2047767_4

DetailsÜbersicht

Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling

Lohmann, G., Müller, K., & Turner, R. (2013). Response to commentaries on our paper: Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, 75, 279–281. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.041.

Item is Freigegeben

einblenden: alle ausblenden: alle

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:

Datensatz-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-001A-14E3-B Versions-Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-001A-14E5-7

Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

ausblenden:

Urheber:
Lohmann, G¹, Autor
Müller, K, Autor
Turner, R, Autor

Affiliations:
1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794

Inhalt

einblenden:

ausblenden:

Schlagwörter: -

Zusammenfassung: First of all, we would like to state that we are pleased that our paper has spawned a vivid debate about the validity of DCM. Given that DCM has been around for so many years, we think that this was long overdue. In the following, we would like to respond to the comments by Friston et al. and Breakspear.