Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  What is the maximum potential for CO(2) sequestration by "stimulated" weathering on the global scale?

Hartmann, J., & Kempe, S. (2008). What is the maximum potential for CO(2) sequestration by "stimulated" weathering on the global scale? NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 95(12), 1159-1164. doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0434-4.

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Hartmann, Jens1, Autor           
Kempe, Stephan2, Autor
Affiliations:
1CRG Chemistry of Natural Aqueous Solutions, Research Area B: Climate Manifestations and Impacts, The CliSAP Cluster of Excellence, External Organizations, Bundesstraße 53, 20146 Hamburg, DE, ou_2025293              
2external, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: ATMOSPHERIC CO2; FERTILIZATION; CHEMISTRY; SILICON; GROWTH; SOILS; CROP; ASHChemical weathering; Carbon cycle; Global change; Carbon sequestration; Mineral fertilization;
 Zusammenfassung: Natural chemical weathering of silicate rocks is a significant sink for soil and atmospheric CO(2). Previous work suggested that natural chemical weathering may be stimulated by applying finely ground silicate rocks to agricultural areas or forests [stimulated weathering (SW)]. However, it remained unknown if this technique is practical to sequester globally significant amounts of CO(2) under realistic conditions. Applying first estimates of "normal treatment" amounts from a literature review, we report here a theoretical global maximum potential of 65 10(6) t sequestered C a(-1) if SW would be applied homogenously on all agricultural and forested areas of the world. This is equivalent to 0.9% of anthropogenic CO(2) emissions (reference period 2000-2005). First, however, the assumed application of SW on most of the considered areas is not economically feasible because of logistic issues, and second the net-CO(2) sequestration is expected to amount to only a fraction of consumed CO(2) due to the energy demand of the application itself (currently similar to 11%). Unless progress in application procedures is provided, the recent realistic maximum net-CO(2)-consumption potential is expected to be much smaller than 0.1% of anthropogenic emissions, and the SW would thus not be one of the key techniques to reduce atmospheric CO(2) concentration. However, literature suggests that for some agricultural areas (croplands) and specifically for rice production areas in humid climates, this SW may be a feasible tool to support international efforts to sequester CO(2). SW may be cost effective for those areas if linked to the CO(2)-emission certificate trade in the future, and increases in crop production are taken into account.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2008-12
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: ISI: 000260293100007
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-008-0434-4
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 95 (12) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 1159 - 1164 Identifikator: ISSN: 0028-1042