Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  How to simulate realistic forward accelerations on a 6dof motion platform

Berger, D., Schulte-Pelkum, J., & Bülthoff, H. (2004). How to simulate realistic forward accelerations on a 6dof motion platform. Poster presented at Fourth Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society (VSS 2004), Sarasota, FL, USA.

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Berger, DR1, Autor           
Schulte-Pelkum, J1, Autor           
Bülthoff, HH1, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: How are visual and physical motion cues integrated in self-motion perception? We performed a psychophysical study to test how forward accelerations can be realistically simulated. Participants were seated on a 6 dof Stewart motion platform and viewed a computer-generated visual scene on a projection screen (54 ×40.5 ). The visual scene consisted of a randomly structured ground plane and sky. Observers were told that eye height was always 2m above ground. In each of the 180 trials, participants experienced a brief simulated forward acceleration (4s ramp, followed by 2s of constant acceleration) that was presented both as platform motion and motion within the visual scene. After the acceleration, the screen went dark and the platform returned to zero in 6s. Participants used a joystick to indicate the realism of the forward acceleration experienced. They were explicitly told to give high ratings for trials in which they convincingly felt moving forward in accordance with the visual stimulus, and low ratings in trials in which they noticed conflicts. In each trial, stimuli were chosen randomly within fixed intervals for all six varied parameters: visual forward accelerations (0–1.5 m/s^2), platform backwards pitch (0–15 ), brief forward translations of the platform (0–0.5m in 4s), ratio of acceleration/deceleration durations for the translations (0.11–1.5), and up/down noise simulating ground roughness (0–7cm) using low-pass filtered noise (cosine window, 0.3–1s). Multiple hierarchical regression analyses performed for each subject revealed that only two parameters had a clear influence on the ratings: higher platform pitches and higher visual accelerations induced a better impression of being accelerated forward. Brief forward translations of the platform and bumps increased believability for some observers. Interestingly, during sensory conflict between canal and visual/otolith cues, the latter dominated, as predicted by a Bayesian model that holds vision as more reliable.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2004-08
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: URI: http://www.journalofvision.org/content/4/8/796.abstract
DOI: 10.1167/4.8.796
BibTex Citekey: 2746
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Fourth Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society (VSS 2004)
Veranstaltungsort: Sarasota, FL, USA
Start-/Enddatum: -

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle

einblenden: