Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Looking in the mirror does not prevent multimodal integration

Helbig, H., & Ernst, M. (2005). Looking in the mirror does not prevent multimodal integration. Poster presented at Fifth Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society (VSS 2005), Sarasota, FL, USA.

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Helbig, HB1, 2, Autor           
Ernst, MO2, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Research Group Multisensory Perception and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497806              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Ernst Banks (2002) showed that humans integrate visual and haptic signals in a statistically optimal way if they are derived from the same spatial location. Integration seems to be broken if there is a spatial discrepancy between the signals (Gepshtein et al., VSS 04). Can cognitive factors facilitate integration even when the signals are presented at two spatial locations? We conducted two experiments, one in which visual and haptic information was presented at the same location. In the second experiment, subject looked at the object through a mirror while touching it. This way there was a spatial offset between the two information sources. If cognitive factors are sufficient for integration to occur, i.e. knowledge that the object seen in the mirror is the same as the one touched, we expect no difference between the two experimental results. If integration breaks due to the spatial discrepancy we expect subjects' percept to be less biased by multimodal information. To study integration participants looked at an object through a distortion lens. This way, for both the “mirrored” and “direct vision” conditions there was a slight shape conflict between the visual and haptic modalities. After looking at and feeling the object simultaneously participants reported the perceived shape by either visually or haptically matching it to a reference object. Both experiments revealed that the shape percept was in-between the haptically and visually specified shapes. Importantly, there was no significant difference between the two experimental results regardless of whether subjects matched the shape visually or haptically. However, we found a significant difference between matching by touch and matching by vision. Haptic judgments are biased towards the haptic input and vice versa. In conclusion, multimodal signals seem to be combined if observers have high-level cognitive knowledge about the signals belonging to the same object, even when there is a spatial discrepancy.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2005-09
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: URI: http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/8/750.abstract
DOI: 10.1167/5.8.750
BibTex Citekey: 3495
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Fifth Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society (VSS 2005)
Veranstaltungsort: Sarasota, FL, USA
Start-/Enddatum: -

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle

einblenden: