Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Learning Inverse Dynamics: A Comparison

Nguyen-Tuong, D., Peters, J., Seeger, M., & Schölkopf, B. (2008). Learning Inverse Dynamics: A Comparison. In 16th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN 2008) (pp. 13-18). Evere, Belgium: d-side.

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Nguyen-Tuong, D1, Autor           
Peters, J1, 2, Autor           
Seeger, M1, Autor           
Schölkopf, B1, Autor           
Verleysen, M., Herausgeber
Affiliations:
1Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497795              
2Dept. Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Max Planck Society, ou_1497647              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: While it is well-known that model can enhance the control performance in terms of precision or energy efficiency, the practical application has often been limited by the complexities of manually obtaining sufficiently accurate models. In the past, learning has proven a viable alternative to using a combination of rigid-body dynamics and handcrafted approximations of nonlinearities. However, a major open question is what nonparametric learning method is suited best for learning dynamics? Traditionally, locally weighted projection regression (LWPR), has been the standard method as it is capable of online, real-time learning for very complex robots. However, while LWPR has had significant impact on learning in robotics, alternative nonparametric regression methods such as support vector regression (SVR) and Gaussian processes regression (GPR) offer interesting alternatives with fewer open parameters and potentially higher accuracy. In this paper, we evaluate these three alternatives for model learning. Our comparison consists out of the evaluation of learning quality for each regression method using original data from SARCOS robot arm, as well as the robot tracking performance employing learned models. The results show that GPR and SVR achieve a superior learning precision and can be applied for real-time control obtaining higher accuracy. However, for the online learning LWPR presents the better method due to its lower computational requirements.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2008-04
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: URI: http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/esann/index.php?pg=esann08_programme
BibTex Citekey: 4936
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: 16th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN 2008)
Veranstaltungsort: Bruges, Belgium
Start-/Enddatum: -

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: 16th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN 2008)
Genre der Quelle: Konferenzband
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Evere, Belgium : d-side
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 13 - 18 Identifikator: -