English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Evaluation of various observing systems for the global monitoring of CO2 surface fluxes

Hungershoefer, K., Breon, F. M., Peylin, P., Chevallier, F., Rayner, P., Klonecki, A., et al. (2010). Evaluation of various observing systems for the global monitoring of CO2 surface fluxes. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(21), 10503-10520. doi:10.5194/acp-10-10503-2010.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
BGC1423.pdf (Publisher version), 5MB
Name:
BGC1423.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/octet-stream / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-
:
BGC1423D.pdf (Preprint), 4MB
Name:
BGC1423D.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/octet-stream / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10503-2010 (Publisher version)
Description:
OA
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Hungershoefer, K., Author
Breon, F. M., Author
Peylin, P., Author
Chevallier, F., Author
Rayner, P., Author
Klonecki, A., Author
Houweling, S., Author
Marshall, J.1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Satellite-based Remote Sensing of Greenhouse Gases, Dr. J. Marshall, Department Biogeochemical Systems, Prof. M. Heimann, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1497789              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: atmospheric transport models carbon-dioxide sinks inversions satellite errors mission space uncertainties information
 Abstract: In the context of rising greenhouse gas concentrations, and the potential feedbacks between climate and the carbon cycle, there is an urgent need to monitor the exchanges of carbon between the atmosphere and both the ocean and the land surfaces. In the so-called top-down approach, the surface fluxes of CO2 are inverted from the observed spatial and temporal concentration gradients. The concentrations of CO2 are measured in-situ at a number of surface stations unevenly distributed over the Earth while several satellite missions may be used to provide a dense and better-distributed set of observations to complement this network. In this paper, we compare the ability of different CO2 concentration observing systems to constrain surface fluxes. The various systems are based on realistic scenarios of sampling and precision for satellite and in-situ measurements. It is shown that satellite measurements based on the differential absorption technique (such as those of SCIAMACHY, GOSAT or OCO) provide more information than the thermal infrared observations (such as those of AIRS or IASI). The OCO observations will provide significantly better information than those of GOSAT. A CO2 monitoring mission based on an active (lidar) technique could potentially provide an even better constraint. This constraint can also be realized with the very dense surface network that could be built with the same funding as that of the active satellite mission. Despite the large uncertainty reductions on the surface fluxes that may be expected from these various observing systems, these reductions are still insufficient to reach the highly demanding requirements for the monitoring of anthropogenic emissions of CO2 or the oceanic fluxes at a spatial scale smaller than that of oceanic basins. The scientific objective of these observing system should therefore focus on the fluxes linked to vegetation and land ecosystem dynamics.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2010
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-10503-2010
ISI: ://000284210400022
Other: BGC1423
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany : European Geosciences Union
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 10 (21) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 10503 - 10520 Identifier: CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/111030403014016
ISSN: 1680-7316