English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  On evaluating ocean models with atmospheric potential oxygen

Naegler, T., Ciais, P., Orr, J. C., Aumont, O., & Rödenbeck, C. (2007). On evaluating ocean models with atmospheric potential oxygen. Tellus, Series B - Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 59(1), 138-156. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00197.x.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
BGC0944.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
BGC0944.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, MJBK; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/octet-stream
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Description:
OA
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Naegler, T., Author
Ciais, P., Author
Orr, J. C., Author
Aumont, O., Author
Rödenbeck, C.1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Inverse Data-driven Estimation, Dr. C. Rödenbeck, Department Biogeochemical Systems, Prof. M. Heimann, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1497785              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: General-circulation model Global carbon-cycle Air-sea flux Gas-exchange CO2 Transport Dioxide Ratio Remineralization Parameterization
 Abstract: We used observed and simulated atmospheric potential oxygen (APO) to evaluate simulated air-sea flux fields from 11 ocean global carbon cycle models. APO is defined in terms of atmospheric CO2, O-2 and N-2 so as not to depend on terrestrial photosynthesis and respiration. Hence, it is in principal suited to evaluate simulated air-sea fluxes of these gases. We forced two different atmospheric transport models, TM2 and TM3, with simulated air-sea fluxes from each of the 11 ocean models, and we compared resulting simulated latitudinal and seasonal variations in APO with observations. Differences between the two atmospheric transport models, which offer a first estimate of uncertainty due to atmospheric transport, are similar in magnitude to the average model-data differences and to the spread between the ocean models. Simulated annual mean meridional APO profiles qualitatively resemble the observations, although at individual stations there remain substantial differences between models and observations. The simulated amplitude of the seasonal APO variability was generally less than observed. We conclude that it is difficult to validate ocean models based on APO because shortcomings in atmospheric transport models and problems with data representativity cannot be distinguished from ocean model deficiencies. [References: 62]

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2007
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00197.x
Other: BGC0944
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Tellus, Series B - Chemical and Physical Meteorology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Copenhagen : Swedish Geophysical Society :
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 59 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 138 - 156 Identifier: CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925506308
ISSN: 0280-6509