English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, adjustment procedures

Audi, G., Wang, M., Wapstra, A., Kondev, F., MacCormick, M., Xu, X., et al. (2012). The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, adjustment procedures. Chinese Physics C, 36(12), 1287-1602. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/002.

Item is

Files

show Files

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Audi, G.1, Author
Wang, Meng2, Author           
Wapstra, A.H.3, Author
Kondev, F.G.4, Author
MacCormick, M.5, Author
Xu, X.6, 7, Author
Pfeiffer, B.8, Author
Affiliations:
1Centre de Spectrométrie Nucléaire et de Spectrométrie de Masse, CSNSM, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-Sud, Bât. 108, F-91405 Orsay Campus, France, ou_persistent22              
2Division Prof. Dr. Klaus Blaum, MPI for Nuclear Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_904548              
3National Institute of Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics, NIKHEF, 1009DB Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
4Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA, ou_persistent22              
5Institut de Physique Nucléaire, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-Sud, F-91406 Orsay cedex, France, ou_persistent22              
6Institute of Modern Physics, CAS, 509 Nanchang Rd., Lanzhou 730000, China, ou_persistent22              
7Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People’s Republic of China, ou_persistent22              
8GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstr. 1, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This paper is the first of two articles (Part I and Part II) that presents the results of the new atomic mass evaluation, AME2012. It includes complete information on the experimental input data (including not used and rejected ones), as well as details on the evaluation procedures used to derive the tables with recommended values given in the second part. This article describes the evaluation philosophy and procedures that were implemented in the selection of specific nuclear reaction, decay and mass-spectrometer results. These input values were entered in the least-squares adjustment procedure for determining the best values for the atomic masses and their uncertainties. Calculation procedures and particularities of the AME are then described. All accepted and rejected data, including outweighed ones, are presented in a tabular format and compared with the adjusted values (obtained using the adjustment procedure). Differences with the previous AME2003 evaluation are also discussed and specific information is presented for several cases that may be of interest to various AME users. The second AME2012 article, the last one in this issue, gives a table with recommended values of atomic masses, as well as tables and graphs of derived quantities, along with the list of references used in both this AME2012 evaluation and the NUBASE2012 one (the first paper in this issue).

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2012-12-05
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: 316
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/002
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Chinese Physics C
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Beijing : Chinese Physics C
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 36 (12) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1287 - 1602 Identifier: -