English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Retention of particulate matter by macrophytes in a first-order stream

Horvath, T. (2004). Retention of particulate matter by macrophytes in a first-order stream. Aquatic Botany, 78, 27-36. doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2003.09.003.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
LFS1038_2003Horvath.pdf (Publisher version), 80KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
LFS1038_2003Horvath.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, MPLM; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Horvath, Thomas1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Limnological River Station Schlitz, Max Planck Institute for Limnology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society, ou_976546              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Streams; Retention; Macrophytes; Organic matter; CPOM
 Abstract: Retention of coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) in streams is affected by channel complexity, especially three-dimensional structures in stream channels. Much attention has focused on woody debris as retention structures, but macrophytes should function similarly. Retention and flow characteristics were measured in 5 m long reaches at four-replicate sites in the Breitenbach (Hessen, Germany). CPOM retention was measured by releasing chips of paper (6 mm diameter) as analog CPOM. Triplicate releases (200 chips each) were done beforew and after submerged, emergent and overhanging macrophytes were removed. Discharge ranged between 3 and 4.5 l s⁻¹ during the experimental releases. Macrophyte biomass removed was 3.047, 3.012, 0.164 and 1.392 kg m⁻² (fresh weight) respectively from sites 1 to 4. Instantaneous retention rates, calculated with an exponential decay function, were significantly higher (P<0.001)with macrophytes than without macrophytes (0.8±0.2 versus 0.2±0.1). Velocity also was significantly reduced by macrophyte presence (P <0.001). Macrophyte biomass was a significant predictor of retention (P <0.001), whereas discharge was not (P = 0.3). Hence, retention appears to be positively related to macrophyte biomass. Macrophytes in the Breitenbach increase retention by forming effective sieve-like structures in the stream physically trapping CPOM and by reducing water velocity.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2004
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 63128
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2003.09.003
Other: 1038
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Aquatic Botany
  Alternative Title : Aquat. Bot.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 78 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 27 - 36 Identifier: ISSN: 03043770