English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Intonation and deontic rights in action formation: 'We x' proposals in Italian

Rossi, G. (2011). Intonation and deontic rights in action formation: 'We x' proposals in Italian. Talk presented at the Centre for Situated Action and Communication. Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, UK. 2011-12-16.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Rossi, Giovanni1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Author           
Affiliations:
1Human Sociality and Systems of Language Use, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_808546              
2International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_1119545              
3Multimodal Interaction, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_55216              
4Interactional Foundations of Language, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_745546              
5Language and Cognition Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_55204              
6Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_792548              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Turns at talk are constructed so as to perform recognizable actions. The concept of action formation and recognition has been central to a great body of research on social interaction, but remains a current and challenging area of investigation. This paper pursues this topic by focussing on proposals (plans for future joint action). In Italian, one common way of making a proposal is by using a first person plural construction like Prepariamo il pranzo, literally “We prepare lunch”. In a corpus of naturally-occurring interaction, this form of proposing comes in two variants which, in the majority of cases, can be formally distinguished only by the intonation contour with which they are uttered. After having described the grammatical and intonational features of the two variants, I account for their distribution in different interactional environments. Conversation analytic work has shown that knowledge asymmetries (epistemics) influence how speakers design questions and assessments. In my analysis, I argue that similar kinds of asymmetries shape the domain of rights and obligations to action (which I refer to as ‘deontics’) and that this influences the way in which speakers enlist others to act together with them. I show that the two types of we x proposal embody different deontic stances towards the engagement of participants in a joint course of action. The first type of we x proposal is delivered with an interrogative intonation contour (rise-fall). This format is used to propose a course of action about which the speaker displays uncertainty, and the selection of which is presented as contingent on the recipient’s acceptance (e.g., Prepariamo il pranzo? “(Shall) we prepare lunch?”). The second type, on the other hand, is delivered with an intonation contour associated with imperative syntax (scooped rise). This format is used to promote a course of action in a way that asserts the speaker’s right to push for its accomplishment, in which the recipient is urged to partake (e.g., Prepariamo il pranzo! “(Let’s) prepare lunch!”). This study calls attention to the importance of speakers’ deontic stances in proposing joint courses of action, and to the crucial role that intonation plays in their formulation and recognition.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2011
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: the Centre for Situated Action and Communication
Place of Event: Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, UK
Start-/End Date: 2011-12-16
Invited: Yes

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show