English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Overview of the INEX 2009 Ad Hoc Track

Geva, S., Kamps, J., Lehtonen, M., Schenkel, R., Thom, J. A., & Trotman, A. (2009). Overview of the INEX 2009 Ad Hoc Track. In S. Geva, J. Kamps, & A. Trotman (Eds.), Preproceedings of the 2009 INEX Workshop (pp. 16-50). Amsterdam: IR Publishers.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Conference Paper
Latex : Overview of the {INEX} 2009 Ad Hoc Track

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Geva, Shlomo1, Author
Kamps, Jaap1, Author
Lehtonen, Miro1, Author
Schenkel, Ralf2, Author           
Thom, James A.1, Author
Trotman, Andrew1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Databases and Information Systems, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, ou_24018              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This paper gives an overview of the INEX 2009 Ad Hoc Track. The main goals of the Ad Hoc Track were three-fold. The first goal was to investigate the impact of the collection scale and markup, by using a new collection that is again based on a the Wikipedia but is over 4 times larger, with longer articles and additional semantic annotations. For this reason the Ad Hoc track tasks stayed unchanged, and the Thorough Task of INEX 2002–2006 returns. The second goal was to study the impact of more verbose queries on retrieval effectiveness, by using the available markup as structural constraints—now using both the Wikipedia’s layout-based markup, as well as the enriched semantic markup—and by the use of phrases. The third goal was to compare different result granularities by allowing systems to retrieve XML elements, ranges of XML elements, or arbitrary passages of text. This investigates the value of the internal document structure (as provided by the XML mark-up) for retrieving relevant information. The INEX 2009 Ad Hoc Track featured four tasks: For the Thorough Task a ranked-list of results (elements or passages) by estimated relevance was needed. For the Focused Task a ranked-list of non-overlapping results (elements or passages) was needed. For the Relevant in Context Task non-overlapping results (elements or passages) were returned grouped by the article from which they came. For the Best in Context Task a single starting point (element start tag or passage start) for each article was needed. We discuss the setup of the track, the results for the four tasks, and examine the relative effectiveness of element and passage retrieval. This is examined in the context of content only (CO, or Keyword) search as well as content and structure (CAS, or structured) search. In addition, we look at the effectiveness of systems using a reference run with a solid article ranking, and of systems using the phrase query. Finally, we look at the ability of focused retrieval techniques to rank articles.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2009
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 520387
Other: Local-ID: C1256DBF005F876D-B7B2910F328FAEE1C1257690003E159C-GevaKLSTT_INEX09
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: 2009 INEX Workshop
Place of Event: Woodlands of Marburg, Australia
Start-/End Date: 2009-12-06 - 2009-12-10

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Preproceedings of the 2009 INEX Workshop
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Geva, Shlomo1, Editor
Kamps, Jaap1, Editor
Trotman, Andrew1, Editor
Affiliations:
1 External Organizations, ou_persistent22            
Publ. Info: Amsterdam : IR Publishers
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 16 - 50 Identifier: ISBN: 978-90-814485-2-9