English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Contribution to Collected Edition

Proportionality and the Bindingness of Fundamental Rights

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons237931

Poscher,  Ralf       
Public Law, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Poscher, R. (2021). Proportionality and the Bindingness of Fundamental Rights. In E. Billis, N. Knust, & J. P. Rui (Eds.), Proportionality in crime control and criminal justice (pp. 49-68). Oxford: Hart Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781509938636.ch-003.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0008-B4A6-1
Abstract
The proportionality principle has developed over time to become a – and in some jurisdictions, such as Germany, the – central standard of constitutional law and human rights. The principle has witnessed a meteoric rise both in Germany and abroad. It has also been incorporated into international human rights law. I will focus on the German development for three reasons of increasing importance. First, pragmatism: I am most familiar with the situation in Germany. Second, history: the international success story of the proportionality principle – at least as portrayed by Aharon Barak – originated in Germany. Third, analysis: German constitutional history reveals most clearly and explicitly the functional, systematic problem that the principle of proportionality is designed to solve.