English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Predator learning differences affect the survival of chemically defended prey

Rowland, H. M., Fulford, A. J. T., & Ruxton, G. D. (2017). Predator learning differences affect the survival of chemically defended prey. Animal Behaviour, 124, 65-74. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.029.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
EXT503.pdf (Publisher version), 620KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
EXT503.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, MJCO; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-
:
EXT503s1.zip (Supplementary material), 76KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
EXT503s1.zip
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, MJCO; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/zip
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Description:
OA
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Rowland, Hannah M.1, Author           
Fulford, A. J. T., Author
Ruxton, G. D., Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Prey animals that possess chemical defences often advertise their unprofitability to predators by a distinctive and conspicuous visual appearance known as aposematism. However, not all chemically defended species are conspicuous, and some are nearly cryptic. Differences in predator community composition and predator behaviour may explain varied levels of prey conspicuousness. We tested this hypothesis by measuring dietary wariness and learning behaviour of day-old chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus, from four strains of laying hens that have been selected for different levels of egg productivity. We used these strains as model predators to test whether predators that vary in the trade-offs associated with foraging behaviour cause differential survival of chemically defended prey with conspicuous signals. We found that strains differed in how they learned about chemically defended prey, which resulted in significant differences in prey survival. The selection pressures imposed by different types of predator could explain whether chemically defended prey evolve varied levels of conspicuousness. Predators' initial wariness of novel prey was not related to learning at the strain or individual level, but predator wariness increased after exposure to chemical defences. Our study provides support for the hypothesis that the evolution of prey defences depends on variation between ecological communities in predator learning behaviour and experience. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2017
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: Other: EXT503
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.029
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Animal Behaviour
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: London : Academic Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 124 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 65 - 74 Identifier: ISSN: 0003-3472
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/110985822458702