English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Coordination Mechanisms for Unrelated Machine Scheduling

Abed, F. (2011). Coordination Mechanisms for Unrelated Machine Scheduling. Master Thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Fidaa Abed_Master's Thesis.pdf (Any fulltext), 161KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
Fidaa Abed_Master's Thesis.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Informatics, MSIN; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Abed, Fidaa1, 2, Author           
Mehlhorn, Kurt1, Advisor           
Huang, Chien-Chung1, Referee           
Affiliations:
1Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, ou_24019              
2International Max Planck Research School, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, ou_1116551              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: We investigate load balancing games in the context of unrelated machines scheduling. In such a game, there are a number of jobs and a number of machines, and each job needs to be scheduled on one machine. A collection of values pij are given, where pij indicates the processing time of job i on machine j. Moreover, each job is controlled by a selfish player who only wants to minimize the completion time of his job while disregarding other players' welfare. The outcome schedule is a Nash equilibrium if no player can unilaterally change his machine and reduce the completion time of his job. It is known that in an equilibrium, the performance of the system can be far from optimal. The degradation of the system performance in Nash equilibrium is defined as the price of anarchy (PoA): the ratio of the cost of the worst Nash equilibrium to the cost of the optimal scheduling. Clever scheduling policies can be designed to reduce PoA. These scheduling policies are called coordination mechanisms. It has been posed as an open question "what is the best possible lower bound when coordination mechanisms use preemption". In this thesis we prove a lower bound of ( logm log logm) for all symmetric preemptive coordination mechanisms. Moreover we study the lower bound for the unusual case when the coordination mechanisms are asymmetric and we get the same bound under the weak assumption that machines have no IDs. On the positive side we prove that the inefficiency-based mechanism can achieve a constant PoA when the maximum inefficiency of the jobs is bounded by a constant.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2011-102011
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: Saarbrücken : Universität des Saarlandes
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: BibTex Citekey: Abed2011
 Degree: Master

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show