日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存
 
 
ダウンロード電子メール
  Limitations to the use of arthropods as temperate forests indicators

Gossner, M. M., Fonseca, C. R., Pašalić, E., Türke, M., Lange, M., & Weisser, W. W. (2014). Limitations to the use of arthropods as temperate forests indicators. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23(4), 945-962. doi:10.1007/s10531-014-0644-3.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
BGC2020.pdf (出版社版), 512KB
 
ファイルのパーマリンク:
-
ファイル名:
BGC2020.pdf
説明:
-
OA-Status:
閲覧制限:
制限付き (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, MJBK; )
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-
CCライセンス:
-

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Gossner, Martin M., 著者
Fonseca, Carlos Roberto, 著者
Pašalić, Esther, 著者
Türke, Manfred, 著者
Lange, Markus1, 著者           
Weisser, Wolfgang W., 著者
所属:
1Molecular Biogeochemistry Group, Dr. G. Gleixner, Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. S. E. Trumbore, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1497775              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: Because arthropods dominate terrestrial ecosystems in species number and biomass, they can potentially play a major role as environmental indicators in applied ecology and nature conservation. We tested the suitability of arthropods as indicators for particular forest types based on a comprehensive standardized sampling of various taxa by different trap types in 93 mature temperate forest sites in three regions of Germany. We tested whether indicator species (1) can be derived for different forest types across regions, (2) are more widespread and more abundant than non-indicator ones, (3) belong to a particular taxon or trophic guild, and (4) are consistent between regions and years. Among 2041 sampled arthropod species, only four were significant indicator species for the same forest type in all region, and no single taxon or guild performed better than other groups. Indicators were generally more abundant and more widespread than non-indicators, but both abundance and distribution varied widely between species. When the analysis was repeated using data from the next year, indicator values of species significantly correlated between years, but the identity of more than 50 % of significant indicators changed, suggesting high among-year variability. We conclude that overall, arthropods did not turn out to be reliable indicators, at least at the scale of Germany. If anything, arthropod indicator species should be defined at the regional scale. Furthermore, indicators should be selected across taxa and trophic levels. Future evaluation of indicator species among arthropods should be conducted over several years based on standardized sampling protocols to develop a reliable definition of indicator species despite the high fluctuations in abundance of species among arthropods, which might either mask or overestimate the indicator value of particular species.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2014-02-012014-02-18
 出版の状態: オンラインで出版済み
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): その他: BGC2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0644-3
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Biodiversity and Conservation
  その他 : Biodiversity Conserv.
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: London : Chapman & Hall
ページ: - 巻号: 23 (4) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: 945 - 962 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 0960-3115
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925579090