English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Use of change-point detection for friction–velocity threshold evaluation in eddy-covariance studies

Barr, A., Richardson, A., Hollinger, D., Papale, D., Arain, M., Black, T., et al. (2013). Use of change-point detection for friction–velocity threshold evaluation in eddy-covariance studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 171-172, 31-45. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.023.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
BPR001.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
BPR001.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, MJBK; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Barr, A.G.1, Author
Richardson, A.D., Author
Hollinger, D.Y., Author
Papale, D., Author
Arain, M.A., Author
Black, T.A., Author
Bohrer, G., Author
Dragoni, D., Author
Fischer, M.L., Author
Gu, L., Author
Law, B.E., Author
Margolis, H.A., Author
McCaughey, J.H., Author
Munger, J.W., Author
Oechel, W., Author
Schaeffer, K., Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The eddy-covariance method often underestimates fluxes under stable, low-wind conditions at night when turbulence is not well developed. The most common approach to resolve the problem of nighttime flux underestimation is to identify and remove the deficit periods using friction–velocity (u*) threshold filters (u*Th). This study modifies an accepted method for u*Th evaluation by incorporating change-point-detection techniques. The original and modified methods are evaluated at 38 sites as part of the North American Carbon Program (NACP) site-level synthesis. At most sites, the modified method produced u*Th estimates that were higher and less variable than the original method. It also provided an objective method to identify sites that lacked a u*Th response. The modified u*Th estimates were robust and comparable among years. Inter-annual u*Th differences were small, so that a single u*Th value was warranted at most sites. No variation in the u*Th was observed by time of day (dusk versus mid or late night), however, a few sites showed significant u*Th variation with time of year. Among-site variation in the u*Th was strongly related to canopy height and the mean annual nighttime u*. The modified u*Th estimates excluded a high fraction of nighttime data – 61% on average. However, the negative impact of the high exclusion rate on annual net ecosystem production (NEP) was small compared to the larger impact of underestimating the u*Th. Compared to the original method, the higher u*Th estimates from the modified method caused a mean 8% reduction in annual NEP across all site-years, and a mean 7% increase in total ecosystem respiration (Re). The modified method also reduced the u*Th-related uncertainties in annual NEP and Re by more than 50%. These results support the use of u*Th filters as a pragmatic solution to a complex problem.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2012-11-302013-04
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: Other: BPR001
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.023
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Amsterdam : Elsevier
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 171-172 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 31 - 45 Identifier: ISSN: 0168-1923
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954928468040