English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Magnetization transfer contrast and T2 mapping in the evaluation of cartilage repair tissue with 3T MRI

Welsch, G., Trattnig S, Scheffler, K., Szomonanyi P, Quirbach S, Merlovits S, Domayer S, Bieri, O., & Mamisch, T. (2008). Magnetization transfer contrast and T2 mapping in the evaluation of cartilage repair tissue with 3T MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 28(4), 979-986. doi:10.1002/jmri.21516.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Welsch, GH, Author
Trattnig S, Scheffler, K1, Author           
Szomonanyi P, Quirbach S, Merlovits S, Domayer S, Bieri, O, Author
Mamisch, TC, Author
Affiliations:
1Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497796              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Purpose To use magnetization transfer (MT) imaging in the visualization of healthy articular cartilage and cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair procedures, and to assess global as well as zonal values and compare the results to T2-relaxation. Materials and Methods Thirty-four patients (17 after microfracture [MFX] and 17 after matrix-associated autologous cartilage transplantation [MACT]) were examined with 3T MRI. The MT ratio (MTR) was calculated from measurements with and without MT contrast. T2-values were evaluated using a multiecho, spin-echo approach. Global (full thickness of cartilage) and zonal (deep and superficial aspect) region-of-interest assessment of cartilage repair tissue and normal-appearing cartilage was performed. Results In patients after MFX and MACT, the global MTR of cartilage repair tissue was significantly lower compared to healthy cartilage. In contrast, using T2, cartilage repair tissue showed significantly lower T2 values only after MFX, whereas after MACT, global T2 values were comparable to healthy cartilage. For zonal evaluation, MTR and T2 showed a significant stratification within healthy cartilage, and T2 additionally within cartilage repair tissue after MACT. Conclusion MT imaging is capable and sensitive in the detection of differences between healthy cartilage and areas of cartilage repair and might be an additional tool in biochemical cartilage imaging. For both MTR and T2 mapping, zonal assessment is desirable.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2008-10
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: URI: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.21516/pdf
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21516
BibTex Citekey: WelschTSSQMDBM2008
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 28 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 979 - 986 Identifier: -