English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  A quantitative evaluation of major plant defense hypotheses, nature versus nurture, and chemistry versus ants

Massad, T. J., Fincher, R. M., Smilanich, A. M., & Dyer, L. (2011). A quantitative evaluation of major plant defense hypotheses, nature versus nurture, and chemistry versus ants. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 5(2), 125-139. doi:10.1007/s11829-011-9121-z.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
BGC1513.pdf (Publisher version), 417KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
BGC1513.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, MJBK; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/octet-stream
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Massad, T. J.1, Author           
Fincher, R. M., Author
Smilanich, A. M., Author
Dyer, L., Author
Affiliations:
1Impact of Fire on Plant Diversity in the Amazon Forest, Dr. T. Massad, Department Biogeochemical Processes, Prof. S. E. Trumbore, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1497782              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Herbivory Generalist Genetic variation Phenotype Plant defense Secondary metabolites Specialist carbon-nutrient balance antiherbivore defenses chemical defense trade-offs herbivore performance secondary metabolites resource availability insect herbivores pieris-rapae food-plants
 Abstract: Variation in plant secondary metabolite content can arise due to environmental and genetic variables. Because these metabolites are important in modifying a plant's interaction with the environment, many studies have examined patterns of variation in plant secondary metabolites. Investigations of chemical defenses are often linked to questions about the efficacies of plant defenses and hypotheses on their evolution in different plant guilds. We performed a series of meta-analyses to examine the importance of environmental and genetic sources of variation in secondary metabolites as well as the antiherbivore properties of different classes of defense. We found both environmental and genetic variation affect secondary metabolite production, supporting continued study of the carbon-nutrient balance and growth-differentiation balance hypotheses. Defenses in woody plants are more affected by genetic variation, and herbaceous plant defenses are more influenced by environmental variation. Plant defenses in agricultural and natural systems show similar responses to manipulations, as do plants in laboratory, greenhouse, or field studies. What does such variation mean to herbivores? A comparison of biotic, physical, and chemical defenses revealed the most effective defensive strategy for a plant is biotic mutualisms with ants. Fast-growing plants are most often defended with qualitative defenses and slow-growing plants with quantitative defenses, as the plant apparency and resource availability hypotheses predict. However, we found the resource availability hypothesis provides the best explanation for the evolution of plant defenses, but the fact that there is considerable genetic and environmental variation in defenses indicates herbivores can affect plant chemistry in ecological and evolutionary time.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2011
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1007/s11829-011-9121-z
ISI: ://000291168200005
Other: BGC1513
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 5 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 125 - 139 Identifier: ISSN: 1872-8855