日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Monthly averages of aerosol properties: A global comparison among models, satellite data, and AERONET ground data

Kinne, S., Lohmann, U., Feichter, J., Schulz, M., Timmreck, C., Ghan, S., Easter, R., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Takemura, T., Tegen, I., Koch, D., Herzog, M., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Holben, B., Eck, T., Smirnov, A., Dubovik, O., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Torres, O., Mishchenko, M., Geogdzhayev, I., Chu, D. A., & Kaufman, Y. (2003). Monthly averages of aerosol properties: A global comparison among models, satellite data, and AERONET ground data. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 108(D20), 4634. doi:10.1029/2001JD001253.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
BGC0611.pdf (出版社版), 7MB
 
ファイルのパーマリンク:
-
ファイル名:
BGC0611.pdf
説明:
-
OA-Status:
閲覧制限:
制限付き (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, MJBK; )
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/octet-stream
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-
CCライセンス:
-

関連URL

表示:
非表示:
説明:
OA
OA-Status:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Kinne, S., 著者
Lohmann, U., 著者
Feichter, J., 著者
Schulz, M., 著者
Timmreck, C., 著者
Ghan, S., 著者
Easter, R., 著者
Chin, M., 著者
Ginoux, P., 著者
Takemura, T., 著者
Tegen, I.1, 著者           
Koch, D., 著者
Herzog, M., 著者
Penner, J., 著者
Pitari, G., 著者
Holben, B., 著者
Eck, T., 著者
Smirnov, A., 著者
Dubovik, O., 著者
Slutsker, I., 著者
Tanre, D., 著者Torres, O., 著者Mishchenko, M., 著者Geogdzhayev, I., 著者Chu, D. A., 著者Kaufman, Y., 著者 全て表示
所属:
1Department Biogeochemical Synthesis, Prof. C. Prentice, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1497753              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: tropospheric aerosol, aerosol component modeling, aerosol module evaluation, direct aerosol radiative forcing, regional comparisons Sky radiance measurements; optical-thickness; sea-salt; tropospheric aerosol; 3-dimensional simulation; carbonaceous aerosols; sulfate aerosol; mineral aerosol; united-states; dust aerosols
 要旨: [1] New aerosol modules of global ( circulation and chemical transport) models are evaluated. These new modules distinguish among at least five aerosol components: sulfate, organic carbon, black carbon, sea salt, and dust. Monthly and regionally averaged predictions for aerosol mass and aerosol optical depth are compared. Differences among models are significant for all aerosol types. The largest differences were found near expected source regions of biomass burning ( carbon) and dust. Assumptions for the permitted water uptake also contribute to optical depth differences ( of sulfate, organic carbon, and sea salt) at higher latitudes. The decline of mass or optical depth away from recognized sources reveals strong differences in aerosol transport or removal among models. These differences are also a function of altitude, as transport biases of dust do not always extend to other aerosol types. Ratios of optical depth and mass demonstrate large differences in the mass extinction efficiency, even for hydrophobic aerosol. This suggests that efforts of good mass simulations could be wasted or that conversions are misused to cover for poor mass simulations. In an attempt to provide an absolute measure for model skill, simulated total optical depths ( when adding contributions from all five aerosol types) are compared to measurements from ground and space. Comparisons to the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) suggest a source strength underestimate in many models, most frequently for ( subtropical) tropical biomass or dust. Comparisons to the combined best of Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ( MODIS) and Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer ( TOMS) indicate that away from sources, model simulations are usually smaller. Particularly large are discrepancies over tropical oceans and oceans of the Southern Hemisphere, raising issues on the treatment of sea salt in models. Totals for mass or optical depth in many models are defined by the absence or dominance of only one aerosol component. With appropriate corrections to that component ( e. g., to removal, to source strength, or to seasonality) a much better model performance can be expected. Still, many important modeling issues remain inconclusive as the combined result of poor coordination ( different emissions and meteorology), insufficient model output ( vertical distributions, water uptake by aerosol type), and unresolved measurement issues ( retrieval assumptions and temporal or spatial sampling biases).

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2003
 出版の状態: 出版
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1029/2001JD001253
その他: BGC0611
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: Washington, D.C. : American Geophysical Union
ページ: - 巻号: 108 (D20) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: 4634 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 0148-0227
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/991042728714264_1