English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Max-min Online Allocations with a Reordering Buffer

Epstein, L., Levin, A., & van Stee, R. (2011). Max-min Online Allocations with a Reordering Buffer. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 25(3), 1230-1250. doi:10.1137/100794006.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
bcover_jour2.dvi (Any fulltext), 116KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
bcover_jour2.dvi
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/x-dvi
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-
:
bcover_jour5_rev_sec.pdf (Any fulltext), 169KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
bcover_jour5_rev_sec.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Epstein, Leah1, Author
Levin, Asaf1, Author
van Stee, Rob2, Author           
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, ou_24019              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: We consider online scheduling so as to maximize the minimum load, using a reordering buffer which can store some of the jobs before they are assigned irrevocably to machines. For $m$ identical machines, we show an upper bound of $H_{m-1}+1$ for a buffer of size $m-1$. A competitive ratio below $H_m$ is not possible with any fixed buffer size, and it requires a buffer of size $\Omega(m/\log m)$ to get a ratio of $O(\log m)$. For uniformly related machines, we show that a buffer of size $m+1$ is sufficient to get a competitive ratio of $m$, which is best possible for any fixed sized buffer. We show similar results (but with different constructions) for the restricted assignment model. We give tight bounds for two machines in all the three models. These results sharply contrast to the (previously known) results which can be achieved without the usage of a reordering buffer, where it is not possible to get a ratio below a competitive ratio of $m$ already for identical machines, and it is impossible to obtain an algorithm of finite competitive ratio in the other two models, even for $m=2$. Our results strengthen the previous conclusion that a reordering buffer is a powerful tool and it allows a significant decrease in the competitive ratio of online algorithms for scheduling problems. Another interesting aspect of our results is that our algorithm for identical machines imitates the behavior of a greedy algorithm on (a specific set of) related machines, whereas our algorithm for related machines completely ignores the speeds until all jobs have arrived, and then only uses the relative order of the speeds.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 20112011
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 618647
DOI: 10.1137/100794006
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/100794006
Other: Local-ID: C1256428004B93B8-066036EC69FA5143C12577F4004F4A70-EpLeSt11a
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Philadelphia, PA : SIAM
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 25 (3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1230 - 1250 Identifier: ISSN: 0895-4801