日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  The role of contextual factors in the use of demonstratives: Differences between Turkish and Dutch

Peeters, D., & Ozyurek, A. (2012). The role of contextual factors in the use of demonstratives: Differences between Turkish and Dutch. Talk presented at the 6th Lodz Symposium: New Developments in Linguistic Pragmatics. Lodz, Poland. 2012-05-26 - 2012-05-28.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 講演

ファイル

表示: ファイル

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Peeters, David1, 2, 3, 著者
Ozyurek, Asli1, 4, 著者           
所属:
1Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, ou_persistent22              
2International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_1119545              
3Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_792551              
4Center for Language Studies , External Organizations, ou_55238              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: An important feature of language is that it enables human beings to refer to entities, actions and events in the external world. In everyday interaction, one can refer to concrete entities in the extra-linguistic physical environment of a conversation by using demonstratives such as this and that. Traditionally, the choice of which demonstrative to use has been explained in terms of the distance of the referent [1]. In contrast, recent observational studies in different languages have suggested that factors such as joint attention also play an important role in demonstrative choice [2][3]. These claims have never been tested in a controlled setting and across different languages. There-fore, we tested demonstrative choice in a controlled elicitation task in two languages that previously have only been studied observational-ly: Turkish and Dutch. In our study, twenty-nine Turkish and twenty-four Dutch partic-ipants were presented with pictures including a speaker, an address-ee and an object (the referent). They were asked which demonstra-tive they would use in the depicted situations. Besides the distance of the referent, we manipulated the addressee’s focus of visual atten-tion, the presence of a pointing gesture, and the sentence type. A re-peated measures analysis of variance showed that, in addition to the distance of the referent, the focus of attention of the addressee on the referent and the type of sentence in which a demonstrative was used, influenced demonstrative choice in Turkish. In Dutch, only the dis-tance of the referent and the sentence type influenced demonstrative choice. Our cross-linguistic findings show that in different languages, people take into account both similar and different aspects of triadic situations to select a demonstrative. These findings reject descrip-tions of demonstrative systems that explain demonstrative choice in terms of one single variable, such as distance. The controlled study of referring acts in triadic situations is a valuable extension to observa-tional research, in that it gives us the possibility to look more specifi-cally into the interplay between language, attention, and other con-textual factors influencing how people refer to entities in the world References: [1] Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2] Diessel, H. (2006). Demonstratives, joint attention and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17:4. 463–89. [3] Küntay, A. C. & Özyürek, A. (2006). Learning to use demonstratives in conversation: what do language specific strategies in Turkish reveal? Journal of Child Language 33. 303–320.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語: eng - English
 日付: 2012
 出版の状態: 不明
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): -
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:
非表示:
イベント名: the 6th Lodz Symposium: New Developments in Linguistic Pragmatics
開催地: Lodz, Poland
開始日・終了日: 2012-05-26 - 2012-05-28

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物

表示: